PersonalizeThe Washington PostCampaign 2012CongressCourts &LawThe Fed PageHealth CarePollingWhite HouseBlogs & ColumnsIssues: EnergyIn the NewsGOP Debate Euthanasia Rick Santorum Ron Paul Obama sings Mitt Romney ???initialComments:true! pubdate:02/22/2012 15:08 EST! commentPeriod:14! commentEndDate:3/7/12 3:8 EST! currentDate:2/22/12 7:0 EST! allowComments:true! displayComments:true!
12 ways to live a better life
The big spenders behind the super PACs
An extraordinary sunrise in Washington
Huguely found guilty of second-degree murderEthicists blast chair of science ethics panel for taking global warming skeptic group’s papers
Text SizePrintE-mailReprints By Associated Press, WASHINGTON — In the field of climate science, when someone — especially skeptics — did something ethically questionable or misrepresented facts, scientist Peter Gleick was usually among the first and loudest to cry foul. He chaired a prominent scientific society’s ethics committee. He created an award for what he considered lies about global warming.
Now Gleick admits that he posed as a board member to get and then distribute to the media sensitive documents from a conservative think tank that is a leader in denying mainstream climate change science.
Loading...CommentsWeigh InCorrections?And ethicists are criticizing the man who took others to task for what they say was stepping way over the ethical line. The think tank, the Chicago-based Heartland Institute, is considering legal action against him.
Gleick, who won a MacArthur genius award and is co-founder of the Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security, was chairman of the American Geophysical Union’s ethics committee. He also had a column at Forbes.com where he criticized climate skeptics and trumpeted the resignation of a scientific journal editor who published a disputed study. He admitted taking Heartland documents Monday night in a blog on The Huffington Post.
Gleick resigned chairmanship of the ethics panel last week.
“What a mess,” said Mark Frankel, head of scientific responsibility for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world’s leading scientific society, which also had Gleick as a panel member on some committees. “It’s compounded by the fact that he was chairman of the ethics committee of a professional society. ... It’s an ethical morass that he finds himself in.”
And Gleick’s actions cast unwarranted doubt on the work of other scientists, Frankel said.
Last week, someone identifying himself as “Heartland insider” sent 15 media members and others six documents, purportedly from Heartland. They included a fundraising document, a budget and a two-page “climate strategy.” They showed the think tank receiving millions of dollars — more than $14 million over six years from one anonymous man — in big contributions with plans to teach school children to question mainstream climate science. It also showed funding of scientists who are climate-change skeptics.
Heartland said the two-page strategy document was a fake and the others were stolen. The Associated Press, which received the documents, was able to verify the accuracy of several of the most sensational parts with the individuals named. The documents caused a stir, mirroring the hacking of climate scientists’ emails two years earlier from a British research center.
“My judgment was blinded by my frustration with the ongoing efforts — often anonymous well-funded and coordinated — to attack climate science and scientists,” Gleick wrote. “Nevertheless, I deeply regret my own actions in this case.”
Not good enough, Heartland president Joseph Bast said in a press release: “It has caused major and permanent damage to the reputations of The Heartland Institute and many of the scientists, policy experts and organizations we work with.”
The issue is about deception and there are only a few things that could possibly warrant that — and embarrassing Heartland isn’t one of them, said Dani Elliott, who teaches ethics at the University of South Florida.
The geophysical union, a scientific society, said in a statement that Gleick’s actions are “inconsistent with our organization’s values.”
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
EmailTumblrRedditStumbleuponDiggDeliciousDiscussion Policy | FAQ | About DiscussionsLoading...CommentsAdd your commentRead about the changes to comment thread appearance, moderation. ?Read what others are sayingAbout Badges SuperFan Badge
SuperFan badge holders consistently post smart, timely comments about Washington area sports and teams.
More about badges | Request a badge Culture Connoisseur BadgeCulture Connoisseurs consistently offer thought-provoking, timely comments on the arts, lifestyle and entertainment.
More about badges | Request a badge Fact Checker BadgeFact Checkers contribute questions, information and facts to The Fact Checker.
More about badges | Request a badge Washingtologist BadgeWashingtologists consistently post thought-provoking, timely comments on events, communities, and trends in the Washington area.
More about badges | Request a badge Post Writer BadgeThis commenter is a Washington Post editor, reporter or producer.
Post Forum BadgePost Forum members consistently offer thought-provoking, timely comments on politics, national and international affairs.
More about badges | Request a badge Weather Watcher BadgeWeather Watchers consistently offer thought-provoking, timely comments on climates and forecasts.
More about badges | Request a badge World Watcher BadgeWorld Watchers consistently offer thought-provoking, timely comments on international affairs.
More about badges | Request a badge Post RecommendedWashington Post reporters or editors recommend this comment or reader post.
You must be logged in to report a comment.
Sign in hereYou must be logged in to recommend a comment.
Sign in hereComments our editors find particularly useful or relevant are displayed in Top Comments, as are comments by users with these badges: . Replies to those posts appear here, as well as posts by staff writers.
All comments are posted in the All Comments tab.
More about badgesGet a badgeTo pause and restart automatic updates, click "Live" or "Paused". If paused, you'll be notified of the number of additional comments that have come in.
Comments our editors find particularly useful or relevant are displayed in Top Comments, as are comments by users with these badges: . Replies to those posts appear here, as well as posts by staff writers. + SHARE THIS DEBATE
Featured Blogs & Columns
Election 2012News and conversation about the 2012 elections.
Fact CheckerThe truth behind the rhetoric
The TakeDan Balz on politics WP Social Reader Hide this Friends' Activity Most Popular in politics Most Popular in politics Most Popular Right Now
Your Friends’ Most Recent Activity
View More ActivityPowered by
The Post Most: PoliticsMost-viewed stories, videos and galleries int he past two hoursMost PopularSantorum on the defensive in GOP debateRomney and Paul successfully call Santorum's conservatism into questionRick Santorum struggles to defend his record in heated debateEuthanasia in the Netherlands: Rick Santorum's bogus statisticsFact checking the CNN debate in ArizonaTop VideosRon Paul calls Rick Santorm a fake (0:35)GOP contenders on the attack (1:26)Candidates draw crowd reactions at GOP debate (1:13)Debate audience boos conception question (6:48)New polls have Obama singing (2:37)Top GalleriesThe big spenders behind the super PACsRepublican presidential candidates debate in ArizonaPresident Obama on the 2012 campaign trailCampaign 2012: Rick SantorumVice President Xi Jinping of China visits the U.S. Fact or Fiction? Loading... Track all the Campaign 2012 fact checks Campaign 2012 tools 
Republican primary tracker Explore the state of the 2012 race in key early states.
Mad Money: Campaign ads Watch the latest campaign ads and track how much candidates spend.
Campaign Finance Explorer See who's raising and spending the most money.
2012 Presidential Candidates
Mitt Romney
Newt Gingrich
Ron Paul
Rick Santorum
Barack ObamaSee AllFeatured Advertiser Links
for L U N G C A N C E R V I C T I M S>>
HIP REPLACEMENT -- did you get one after '03?>>Help Barack stand up for working Americans. Join our campaign now.>>The only candidate fighting for the middle class: Pres. Obama. Join us.>>Sign up for email updates from President Obama's 2012 campaign.>>Sign up for official email updates from Barack Obama's campaign.>>Looking to buy a home? Visit TWP Real Estate section for the latest open houses.>>Make Your Vanguard Investing More Profitable - Free Research Report Reveals Best & Worst Funds>>Top politics Stories People Also ReadMost Popular Videos
Mitt Romney attacks put Rick Santorum on defensive in GOP presidential debateDan Balz; Sandhya Somashekhar?
Romney and Paul successfully call Santorum’s conservatism into questionAaron Blake?
Rick Santorum struggles to defend his record in heated debateFelicia Sonmez?
Euthanasia in the Netherlands: Rick Santorum’s bogus statisticsGlenn Kessler?
Fact checking the CNN debate in ArizonaGlenn Kessler?Ethicists blast chair of science ethics panel for taking global warming skeptic group’s papersAssociated Press?
Supreme Court conflicted about prosecuting those who lie about military valorRobert Barnes?Ron Paul ad attacks Santorum, says former Pennsylvania senator is no fiscal conservativeAssociated Press?
Rick Santorum’s ‘phony theology’ criticism of Obama follows a familiar themeRosalind S. Helderman?
Arizona Republican Debate live blogAaron Blake; Rachel Weiner; Natalie Jennings?
Sarah Palin staff lashes out at media, film: A ‘lesser man would have hanged himself by now’Aaron Blake?
President Obama sings ‘Sweet Home Chicago’ with B.B. King and Buddy GuyNatalie Jennings?
Analysis: GOP focus on social issues fires up the right, may leave independents coldAssociated Press?
Oh Daniel Radcliffe, do grow upDelia Lloyd?
Super PAC donors revealed: Who are the power players in the GOP primary?Dan Eggen; T.w. Farnam?
Indiana lawmaker Bob Morris: Girl Scouts promote abortion, homosexualityAssociated Press?
It’s Democrats who are putting focus on birth controlMelinda Henneberger?
Suspicious mail sent to at least 5 congressional officesEd O'keefe?
Michigan Democratic Party encourages crossover voting in GOP presidential primaryAaron Blake?
About the Fact CheckerGlenn Kessler? Ways you can get us Mobile Apps Newsletter & alerts RSS Post Store Facebook Photo Store Twitter Washington Post Live The Washington Post Work for us Community Relations PostPoints Corrections/Suggestions Archive Contact the Ombudsman Report a problem Web site Make us your homepage Digital Guidelines Ask The Post Newspaper Subscribe Home delivery service e-Replica Advertise In the newspaper On the web site Mobile Events The Washington Post Company Post Company web sites Partners Slate Express Night Out Captial Business El Tiempo Latino The Root Foreign Policy Trove Post Tickets Capitol Deal Service Alley Post Master Class WP Live Student Advisor College Reviews ? 1996- The Washington Post Terms of Service Privacy Policy Reprints and Permissions RSS Terms of Service Help Contact Us Ad Choices Section:/politicsed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Ed Hardy Mens
